Arizona Theatre Matters Education · Inquiry Toolkit

Flight of the Dove

Practical pathways into narration, historical evidence, conscience, chronology, Native history, nonviolent inquiry, theatrical form, and accessible storytelling.

Start Here

This Toolkit accompanies Jeanmarie Simpson’s Flight of the Dove. Use it before or after the production, with the Study Guide, or as a stand-alone collection for theatre, history, writing, public humanities, and community inquiry.

Essential question: What becomes possible when a person moves toward what others have already named as the enemy?

Facilitation with Care

The play engages war, the Holocaust, Nanjing, Wounded Knee, racism, violence against women and children, political harassment, death, and reproductive control. Give participants advance information and provide multiple ways to engage. No participant should be required to disclose personal experience of violence, war, family history, identity, or political belief.

When working with Native history, use specific nations and Native-created or Native-curated sources whenever possible. The wagon story functions as drama; it should not replace documented histories of particular Native peoples.

Inquiry Activities

20 to 35 minutes

1 · The Narrator Lab: From Information to Drama

Choose a simple stage direction such as “Jeannette crosses to the butcher block and kneads the dough.” Write the most neutral action description possible, then write the same information in the Narrator’s voice. Perform both aloud.

Identify what changed: rhythm, attitude, relationship, humor, emotional temperature, or audience attention.

Reflection: At what point does interpretation become too much? At what point does neutrality become dramatically dead?

20 to 35 minutes

2 · Observable / Interpretive / Personal

Make three columns: Observable, Interpretive, and Personal.

Choose five Narrator moments. Mark what anyone in the room could verify, what meaning the Narrator adds, and what the line reveals about the Narrator as a person.

20 to 30 minutes

3 · The Authority Problem

Stage the same short historical passage three ways: as official history; as a story shared across a kitchen table; and as if the Narrator has just realized the story is personally implicating.

Discuss which choices make the Narrator feel most human and which create institutional authority.

25 to 40 minutes

4 · Circle the Wagons

Create a phrase map: literal meaning in the wagon story; metaphorical meaning in political or psychological behavior; institutional meaning when organizations close ranks; and personal meaning when Jeannette becomes defensive.

Final question: Is the opposite of “circling the wagons” openness, vulnerability, curiosity, diplomacy, courage, or something else?

45 to 75 minutes

5 · Before the Shot

Choose one major conflict referenced in the play. Research only the period before open warfare or mass violence.

Look for diplomatic choices, refugee policy, economic pressure, propaganda, dehumanizing language, arms buildup, nonviolent resistance, missed opportunities, and structural causes.

Present the findings as a “prehistory of inevitability.” Identify the point where later accounts begin treating war as though no alternatives had ever existed.

40 to 60 minutes

6 · One Vote, Three Documents

Use three sources: the December 8, 1941 House tally sheet; a period newspaper account of Rankin’s vote; and one later historical interpretation.

For each, ask: What does it know? What does it value? What language does it use for Rankin? What is absent? How close is it to the event?

Then write a 300-word account that makes its own point of view visible rather than pretending to have none.

45 to 70 minutes

7 · Wounded Knee: Three Kinds of Memory

Place beside one another a federal historical account, a Lakota-created or Native-curated source, and the child Jeannette sequence in the play.

Identify which details belong to documented history, communal or cultural memory, and dramatic imagination.

Discussion: How can theatre allow moral response without claiming imagination is the same thing as evidence?

25 to 40 minutes

8 · The Enemy in the Sentence

Collect words used to define people before encounter: enemy, savage, traitor, coward, Nazi, and others.

For each word ask who uses it, what action becomes easier after it is applied, what evidence supports it, and what evidence disappears behind it.

Rewrite one conflict using only observable actions before allowing category words.

30 to 45 minutes

9 · Bread Timeline

Draw two timelines. Timeline A places the historical years in the order the audience encounters them. Timeline B tracks the bread from yeast and water to finished rolls.

Why place a simple forward process inside a backward biography?

Creative extension: Choose another ordinary process and sketch how it could function as a dramatic clock inside a nonlinear play.

25 to 40 minutes

10 · Everyman Map

List every identity Everyman takes on in one section. Group them by function: interviewer, authority, family, admirer, opponent, witness, child, institution.

What happens when the same body keeps producing contradictory social voices?

45 to 70 minutes

11 · Pacifism Without a Straw Man

Do not divide the room into “for war” and “against war.” Divide inquiry into four questions: Prevention, Protection, Resistance, and Aftermath.

Each group proposes violent and nonviolent responses and evaluates likely human costs. The goal is not agreement. The goal is to make the word “realistic” work harder.

30 to 50 minutes

12 · Letter into Scene

Choose a short historical letter by Rankin or another reformer. Read it first as a document. Then stage it, adding only one physical task, one Narrator line describing visible action, and one Everyman interruption drawn from historical context.

Discuss how theatrical framing changes the meaning of a primary source without changing its words.

20 to 35 minutes

13 · The Narrator’s Private Note

Write one page the Narrator would never speak aloud: what does he think of Jeannette after spending the whole play with her?

He may admire her and still be irritated by her, disagree with her and still be moved. Contradiction is the assignment.

20 to 35 minutes

14 · “She Went in the Direction…”

Complete the sentence “She went in the direction…” five different ways, turning it toward political, familial, historical, interpersonal, and internal conflict.

Then write or stage a short scene in which a character physically moves toward a source of fear before speaking.

Teacher and Group Discussion Notes

Start with a question, not a verdict

The play becomes smaller if discussion begins with “Was Rankin right?” More productive openings include:

  • What problem does Rankin think violence cannot solve?
  • What problem do her opponents think nonviolence cannot solve?
  • At what point does prevention become intervention?
  • Who bears the cost of each method?

Keep history and drama in conversation

Label claims by type: documented fact, quotation, dramatic reconstruction, family story, interpretation, or metaphor.

Use specific Native histories

Identify Lakota history specifically when discussing Wounded Knee and seek Native-created or Native-curated sources.

Let contradiction remain

Rankin can be courageous and infuriating. A historical figure can be visionary in one area and limited in another. Discussion does not need to resolve tension into a lesson.

Make access part of the artistic analysis

Ask the same aesthetic questions about narration that you would ask about lighting, sound, acting, or design: Is the information clear? Is the language alive? Does it belong to this world? What relationship does it create with the audience?

Primary Sources for Activities

Continue Exploring

This Toolkit is designed to support classroom conversation, community engagement, artist training, and deeper reflection. Its aim is inquiry rather than predetermined agreement about Rankin’s political positions or the historical conflicts represented in the play.